I put quotes around the ones that are written on the lens.
Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM Lens Review - The-Digital-Picture.com I shoot dozens of weddings every year but the 135mm stayed in my bag a majority of the time; I just didn't find myself needing to use it. Most small refracting telescopes start in the 300 to 400 mm focal length range, and even these are classed as widefield telescopes. IS would also help outside with wind. You can barely tell it's a pond.#3: Duck.Birds with bokeh are fine. But I would argue that a 135mm F2 lens produces even greater bokeh, thanks to the long focal length that compresses the background far more than the 85mm lens. Oh and it's stabilised. $449.00. There's just nothing there. This is actually worse than just plain obsession with blur. The Canon is about as sharp as the Samyang, but it has some very slight chromatic aberration. I would love to see his test images. Often need f2.2 to f2.8 to gain sufficient DOF for human subjects. DPReview March Madness, round one - vote! however i started to realise how every subject might actually be a cardboard cutout being photographed. Large focus ring. (Dpreview), Use the 500 Rule to find the Perfect Exposure Length for Astrophotography, Use a DSLR Ha Filter for Astrophotography, AstroBackyard | Astrophotography Tips and Tutorials2023, Optical Construction: 11 Glass elements in 7 Groups. Ironically all the sample images in this post are painfully soft. Canon's 700-200 zooms have IS and are weather sealed two features that the 135 f/2 lacks. Please ride off on the same horse you rode in on. Overall, the lens feels very solid and well constructed. Unfortunately, standard photography lenses are generally poorly corrected for CA at the red end of the spectrum, relying on the human eye's poorer resolution in red than green or blue. Best lenses for astrophotography: 50, 85 and 135mm - DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging - Cloudy Nights Cloudy Nights Astrophotography and Sketching DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. It really is about talent, creativity, and vision, not gear. They just wanted to increase their joy from photography. USM works so quickly and accurately, it puts my 24-70/f2.8L to shame. I have a Nikon d 500. The first shot I ever took with this lens was of my neighbor's cat, as it was sneaking around in a bush. I also tested 200 f/2.8 tele and it is one of the most perfect lens in existence, as well as the 135. This lens has only two drawbacks. Here are our top picks for the canon lenses for astrophotography. The only reason i sell this lens is because of versatility. My 24-70L needs to be stopped down to f5.6 to begin to match the sharpness of my 135L at f2.0 (the test shots were of the portrait of Andrew Jackson on a $20 bill). When all that was available were APS-C crop cameras a 85mm lens provided a near equivalent view angle to the 135mm on a full frame camera. People mistake "Bokeh" to blurry background, what is very very common mistake. I am a complete amateur at photography in general and this is all new to me so thank you for all the information and videos. When the aperture is stopped down to 37mm using step-down filter rings, this lens produces incredibly tiny pinpoint star images from edge to edge. Take care not to confuse this lens with the 200mm F4 SMC Takumar 6x7 which has a different optical configuration, and which I have never tested. Hi Thomas As far as I know, the Nikon D500 is not modified for astrophotography out of the box (it includes a built in IR cut filter that blocks much of the 656nm wavelength). The Rho Ophiuchi Cloud Complex by Eric Cauble using the Samyang 135mm F/2 lens. if you compare images taken with this lens to those from a 105mm f1.8 ais or a cosina 125mm and you'll see what i mean. If you don't like that article that's your right as a member. A single, 90-second exposure using the Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC at F/4. Well, if you consider downloading a lens image from https://www.bhphotovideo.com, and photoshop it on top of my photos to cover mistakes, and demonstrate sharpness of a lens with a jpeg that is way oversharpened; if you call knowledge that "the long focal length compresses the background" , If you call blurr a bokeh just because it sounds better, and so on 1000 words would not be enough to point out what a mess this review is Then you are right, I absolutely do not know as much as he does. 2. Ive set the f-stop to F/2.8, to sharpen up the stars a bit. We have come to accept that most lenses are strong in only one or two of these three factors, that I personally focus on when researching lenses to buy. Not too heavy. Otherwise, on FF body this lens is wonderful. i also have the 300mm f4.5 non ED nikkor which is quite nice . The lens hood is removable (and reversible), which makes packing the Rokinon 135mm away into the included lens pouch possible. I typically shoot with Canon lenses, but the potential for low light photography (whether thats astrophotography or the ability to film at dusk) caught my interest. (purchased for $900), reviewed April 15th, 2011 A higher-res Blackmagic Studio Camera just dropped. Here is a recent ones taken with the canon xs and a lens. The OP admits he limited experience with lenses other than what he has. OK guysTOS rule number one "Posts that are not respectful of other individuals (be they members or not) are not welcome here.". In this review, however, I am using the lens on a crop sensor (APS-C) Canon EOS 60Da, which puts the field of view at 12.4 degrees. I have never had a bad experience buying used Canon lenses from eBay sellers with 99.5%+ positive feedback. Here is a short list of great astrophotography targets to shoot at 135mm with this lens: Below, is an incredible example of the types of projects possible with the Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 lens. You can also find him as @mwroll on Instagram and 500px. If You can not, buy Canon EF 85/1.8, which delivers quite similar results.
Rokinon 135mm f/2.0 ED UMC Lens (Canon EF) - B&H Photo Ive captured a lot of deep-sky astrophotography targets from the northern hemisphere, but Im usually in too deep to capture an entire region of space at once. Also Nikon DC 135mm f/2 is a great lens, a little better than 135mm Canon Definetely the most sharpest lens which I have ever seen. I would only recommend this lens for casual photographers where missed shot means nothing. But will live with it as it provides good protection of the front element. Did anybody use this lens for DSLR astrophoto? Otherwise this lens is absolutely incredible. Find out what happens when Chris shoots some very expired APS film using old Canon and Nikon cameras. Of the old teles I've had, Nikon's 400mm f/3.5 was decent, Olympus's 300mm f/4.5 was good (it had a precursor to ED glass) Pentax's 300mm Takumar was TERRIBLE, Pentax's 500mm was terrible, Nikon's 135 f/2.8 Q was ok, and Sigma's 400mm f/5.6 "apo" was satisfactory. I'm thinking a modern (but expensive) Nikon 200mm f/2.0, 300mm f/4 or f/2.8 or a Borg telephoto/telescope would all be very good. (And cost less too). it is crisp, fast, and awsome. Is there a reason why a 135/2.8 or even 135/4 would provide significantly different images? The 135mm Rokinon with the Canon Rebel seems like a pretty good setup. Although this lens feels solid, it is rather light when compared to a telescope. Super sharp and renders beautiful creamy bokeh. Star parties or dark sky excursions are another great time to use a camera lens in place of the telescope. From far to near, the AF is instantaneous. I do not think telephoto lenses would be suitable for use with your modified camera. All of them are extremely sharp and produce mouth-watering bokeh, and all of them are reasonably priced for what you get. The first telephoto lens of choice, especially recommended for beginners, is the 135mm F2.5 SMC Pentax. The Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 includes a lens hood, lens pouch, front and rear lens caps, and a 1-year Rokinon manufacturer warranty.
Why you should own a 135mm F2 lens - DPReview As you can see, the magnification of the lens used will dictate the type of projects you shoot. Now, I have to admit that up to this point, it sounds a little too good to be true. This brings me to my question. Thats quite a jump from 135mm, so the camera body you use with this lens may change the types of targets you shoot. No, Mr. Thanks, Chris, hi Trevor my name is sagar i have same lens but i have one question why lot of stars are appearing in my image which is taken thru rokinon 135mm, Your email address will not be published. While some people LOVE the bokeh circles (first photo), others hate them and consider them a distraction.The 50mm f/1.8 is hardly a lens to talk about. I love this lens, The Sharpest Lens available for Eos cameras IMO Several functions may not work. In this post, Ill share my results using an affordable prime telephoto lens for astrophotography, the Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC. . In this buying guide weve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing around $2000 and recommended the best. However, as I have no actual experience with the Baader filter, I would suggest that you consult other members on the particular APO - Baader filter combination you have in mind. Are you really using 135 a lot? I think the readers would welcome contributions from other members' experiences. But first, there are several general rules which must be understood. (purchased for $1,100), reviewed August 12th, 2009 The Rokinon 14mm F/2.8 was the first lens I had ever used like this, and these aspects do not hinder the astrophotography experience whatsoever. AF is accurate and very fast. The F/2.0 maximum aperture of the Rokinon 135mm lens offers a chance to collect a serious amount of signal in a single shot.
Digital Cameras & Digital Camera Kits | Camera Gear | B&H If anything the argument in favor of even smaller and lighter 85/1.4s (like the 600g Sigma DN) is stronger than ever, and I say that as someone that loves shooting at 135-150mm. Stopping down would actually have improved the picture. As you'd expect from a premium prime lens, both maximum and average chromatic aberration is very low across the aperture range, with the maximum CA on the order of 0.02% of frame height regardless of aperture.
Are Prisons Obsolete Summary Sparknotes,
Articles C